If the global temperature trend were headed downward instead of upward, what would we do to forestall another ice age?
We'd burn every bit of slash and plant scrap we could lay our hands on to pump up the greenhouse effect of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Turning that into policy would be as easy as falling off a (burning) log, except that perhaps the oil industry would lobby for a cut of the burning program. Hey, something for Republicans to do to gum up the works in favor of their corporate sponsors! Even ethanol producers would start to ballyhoo the carbon footprint of their fertilizers, cultivation, and product transport in hope of having it both ways. Bipartisan subsidy too!
No doubt someone - maybe me - would whinge about the disproportionate Chinese contribution to solving global cooling. Why do they get to have all the campfires!? I remember when America led the world accidentally sparking forest fires!
Bonus graphic:
When I first saw a graph like this in the late 1970s, it wasn't even called the Keeling Curve, but it was already cause for worry. In the meantime, propaganda, not science, is the only force diminishing that concern. CO2 keeps right on trucking.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Only you can cause forest fires
Labels:
bipartisan,
china,
democrat,
energy,
global warming,
new york times,
oil,
republican,
science
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment