I'll be interested to read this whole article sometime outside working hours, but the first page is replete with what's wrong with our political culture.
An elite insider (from Harvard no less) resigns in protest but doesn't say anything in public that could actually raise the issues he supposedly cares about.
After leaving the Office of Legal Counsel, Goldsmith was uncertain about what, if anything, he should say publicly about his resignation. His silence came to be widely misinterpreted.
Whose fault was that? Instead, he waits
four years and then publishes a book that whitewashes his own role in the finlandization of Congress.
As an insider, he feared international accountability for the Bushists:
While at the Pentagon, Goldsmith wrote a memo for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warning that prosecutors from the International Criminal Court might indict American officials for their actions in the war on terror. Goldsmith described this threat as “the judicialization of international politics.”
Yeah, just like Nuremberg. Look, it's pretty simple, Goldsmith: Those memos you "fought against"
were put into practice by the Gonzo, Rummy, and Duhbya at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, the black sites, and no doubt many other locations. You had a
moral obligation to speak out against this, and you didn't.
But, in elite circles, all that matters is personality and manners:
When I asked whether he thought Gonzales should have resigned and whether Addington should follow, he demurred. “I was friends with Gonzales and feel very sorry for him,” he said. “We got along really well. I admired and respected Addington, even when I thought his judgment was crazy. They thought they were doing the right thing.”
They couldn't possibly be war criminals. I like them!
Feh.
