Just turned off Bill Maher's panel discussion. Is there anything rational about a media culture in which Andrew Sullivan can admit to having finally accepted the scientific consensus on global warming and then belabor Hillary Clinton for not having a strong enough plan to cope with it?
Really, can we at least agree to send the psychopathically certain - and wrong - off to silent penance in some abbey for failed pundits?
Sullivan wouldn't even admit to having been wrong. Instead, he made some excuse about now having the scientific evidence, while slamming the standards of truth of liberals. What a piece of work!
Friday, October 26, 2007
Silent penance in some abbey for failed pundits
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment