Conservatives may not be able to agree whether the unrest in Egypt is a good thing, but you can be sure they'll all eventually jump on the Duhbya/neocon vindication bandwagon:
"We might be in a better position if we had more closely followed President Bush's prescription for support of greater democracy in all parts of the world," Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Arizona, said as he stepped off the Senate floor Monday. "If we had maintained that position and had that reputation in the world….then our calls today for restraint would have more credibility because the people of Egypt would know our heart was with their desire for greater representation."Kyl (R-sow's ear) is saying that Egyptians would luuuv us if we had just remained fully committed to killing hundreds of thousands more of their fellow Arab Muslims, if we hadn't stopped there but had proceeded to attack Saudi Arab and Persian Muslims. Then we would have credibility when calling for restraint, whatever the hell he means by that. He's blithely relying on the complete captious ignoramus stupidity of his base and the vast wasteland of American media (o.k., no longer so vast).
Of course, Duhbya did convince a majority of Americans to go to war in the first place because his advisers from the PNAC thought we could swoop into the crossroads of the Middle East and impose Western democracy without the least goddamn bit of nation-building. Hell, god was just going to show up, kick allah's ass, and everyone would kiss his ring. Does Disney have the rights to that bullshit? Better aim that animated nonsense at preschoolers - everyone old enough to disbelieve in Santa Claus would know better.
So maybe Kyl's not an idiot for supposing he can get away with this malodorous bullshit.
Republicans are confused by the obvious doom that faces the Mubarak/mukhabarat regime. The protesters are showing him their shoes, but at least they aren't winging them at him. When Mubarak concedes to his own term limits, he thinks he's compromising. Moron. Rulers don't win by saying they'll go away at some future time. He's toast.
Still, Republicans want to know how can they bend the facts to their advantage. (Hint: Don't speak too soon, for the wheel's still in spin!) Mohamed ElBaradei, whom they despised when he was pursuing inspections and non-proliferation with Iran, looks o.k. - not too-too Islam-y - but what if the Muslim Brotherhood is the real power? What if self-government in Egypt is anti-American?
(Republican note to self: Be of good cheer. Remember that Americans don't remember shit. If it stops being on TV, well, outta sight outta mind.)
The aspiration to self-government is a good thing (except in poor people who might like ACORN). While the panicky and mercurial two-year-olds who compose so much of American society these days still like Egyptian rebellion, here's the bigger, better bullshit that kneecaps Jon Kyl's thin luuuv for Duhbya:
- Duhbya and the Republicans made war in the Middle East, which inspired zero popular movements to depose autocrats.
- President Obama has taken only a few steps toward peace, and, voilà, the yearning for self-government has broken out all over the place!
- QED, bitches! (Just please skip that French word in the previous bullet.)
We are in bed with local authoritarians precisely because they can be bribed to suppress the street. Whole peoples are hard to bribe - for a reasonable price, anyway. Mubarak could cream off his cut of our foreign aid every year and build a fine set of overseas investment accounts. (Dictator 101 - it's right there in the handbook: In case of revolution, you'd better have some swag somewhere else.)
Half a billion dollars a year (wild, unsubstantiated guess) can pay for one very decadent family - just ask Paris Hilton - but it doesn't go that far when split 80 million ways. We can't pay them all off! (That would be socialism anyway!)
I'd reckon Mubarak's presidency less than a week to survive. Then there will be a caretaker, then who knows?
The Republicans will attack Obama at every turn. When Mubarak flees, Obama will not have stood by a stalwart ally. When the caretaker comes in, Obama will not have steered another sovereign nation well enough to get our boy into office. (The Republicans use the word sovereign situationally. For us, it means absolute unfettered authority. For other countries, it means absolute unfettered authority - for us! We win!)
When the caretaker is ousted (anyone remember Shahpour Bakhtiar?), Obama will not have stabilized his government enough. When there's any hint of Islam, even an innocent hint and the hints are not likely to be limited to innocent hints, it will be Obama's fault that he didn't cast a nationwide spell over every Egyptian first-born in order to get America's interests looked after first and foremost (sovereignty). If we object to that expectation, the GOPers'll say that we thought all along that Obama is the messiah. Never mind that they projected that on us, the media will run with it.
Because it's just stupid enough to have universal appeal.