It's easy to see why Bill O is so popular in the ignoramus caucus. His basic message is that anything he's ignorant of isn't cause for learning since it proves that god exists.
This use of god as a safe container for ignorance is actually a basic philosophical problem of many arguments that claim the world shows the existence of god. The more we explain naturalistically, the smaller a sphere remains for a god.
When Intelligent Design creationists claim irreducible complexity, they are trying to dress this same principle in sciency truthiness. In their logic, the science is unable to explain something (undeniably true in many cases), therefore, ahem, mumbo jumbo, bafflegab, there is no explanation other than god.
Of course, so far, every so-called example of irreducible complexity the ID creationists have raised has been shot down by real scientists.
The forces of ignorance can't win in science. They should stick to politics, where they completely dominate the Republican Party, especially its base of religious and free-market fundamentalists.
3 hours ago