Will Michael Mukasey's nomination get out of Senate Judiciary? The forces of good need eleven votes. There are three Republicans whom one might consider possible:
- Arlen Specter (R-PA) - no way; he'll weasel again
- Charles Grassley (R-IA) - nope; one teensy imperfection won't change Grassley's mind
- Lindsey Graham (R-SC) - again, no way; his bipartisanship is limited to talk
- Joe Biden (D-DE)
- Dick Durbin (D-IL)
- Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) (good riddance Lincoln Chafee)
- my man Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
- Pat Leahy (D-VT) - as chair, holding his fire
- Herb Kohl (D-WI)
- Russ Feingold (D-WI)
- Chuck Schumer (D-NY) - dithering while he changes his mind, but he will
- Benjamin Cardin (D-MD) - don't know much about him, but he voted against cloture for Leslie Southwick
I'm not optimistic that we'll run the table. The next line of defense is cloture. Based on the Southwick vote, 62-35, there's hope. Three Democrats voted for cloture and against the nomination (punks!):
- Carper (D-DE)
- Inouye (D-HI)
- Salazar (D-CO)
Look, this isn't even a close call. An AG who won't identify waterboarding as torture is worse than no AG at all.
Asked whether Bush was saying he would not nominate anyone if Mukasey were rejected, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said: "We don't believe it would come to that. No nominee could meet the test they've presented."What she means is no nominee the Bushists would present could meet the test. Still, any honest nominee could easily meet this kindergarten-level test.
Update: I was proven wrong probably even before I finished this post. See my intemperate follow-up.
No comments:
Post a Comment