Liberty and justice for all.
The President needs to maintain his exceptional dignity while telling Teapublican assholes like Pete Sessions to hit the road and not come back. They won't respect anything less.
One who is presumed to possess "exceptional dignity" shouldn't be a pathological liar.
So no problem for Obama on that score. You just imagine he's lying when he says things that you disagree with, which is a typical infantile wingnut habit.
"You can keep your plan" "You can keep your doctor" The Affordable Care Act will save the average family of four $2,500.00 a year" "Bengazi was not a terrorist attack but a spontaneous demonstration caused by an offensive video" "I've reduced the deficit by half" Care to address any of these statements from the liar-in-chief? I'm sure you'll pretend to be the MSM and be delighted to run cover for your favorite Bolshevik.
I almost forgot about my all time Obama whopper;"The affordable care act will not raise the deficit one dime." "It will be deficit neutral." LAMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
When the light of the truth is shined upon a Communist, he will always retreat like a surprised cockroach.
It makes me laugh when you copy and paste obvious bullshit. And then I get another laugh at your expense when you actually whine about the fact that I won't publish that thoroughly debunked bullshit.I mean, the bullshit smells even without debunking. First, zero citations, just assertions meant to appeal to small-minded fuckwits like you. But then alleged lie after alleged lie fails even to assert a lie! Look at #46. Always supporting universal healthcare and paying for it via broad-based taxation is obviously not a lie - it's implementation of policy.You can't see that through the hatred. Or maybe you're just a few bricks shy of a load in the IQ department.Yeah, I'd bet on the latter, fuckwit.
Other facts you were too whatever to learn:"keep your plan" - The individual insurance market has been full of bad, awful, scammy plans. You can't keep those, but you're most likely going to find a plan that's either better or cheaper or both."keep your doctor" - Probably. In any case, no worse than the previous market, since we still have a private market for health insurance, it just has to abide by more regulations."save $2,500 a year" - Obama's projections were too optimistic, but they're still projected for 2019. Initial premiums in states that have given Obamacare something other than neo-Confederate-inspired massive resistance have seen lower premiums than expected, so the savings may arrive sooner than that."Benghazi" - Oh, christ, Benghazi was a tragedy, no doubt, but there's zero culpability in the White House, other than an error. Seriously, you reichwing morons didn't blame Duhbya for pointedly ignoring a specific briefing, which led to 9/11 and a huge, long course of CYA lies, but now you want to draw and quarter Obama because four Americans in a hot zone where you bastards had refused to improve security were killed by a rabble that Obama's people didn't correctly identify in the first few days. It's like accusing me of wasting your air because I'm still breathing."reduced deficit by half" - True, if you believe the CBO projections. Since you're a dishonest dipshit, you only believe those when they help you make your point. No, wait, the 2013 deficit has already been incurred, $680 billion, down from Duhbya's last deficit (2009) of $1.4 trillion. Are you another fuckwit who doesn't know the difference between the debt and the deficit?Obamacare is better than deficit neutral. It lowers the deficit. Not as much as single-payer would, but it's a start.So, again, as ever, you're oh-for. Consistent, I'll give you that.Consistently, obtusely wrong.
By the way, you're so dense you wouldn't recognize the vast difference between a liberal and a Bolshevik until the instant before the Bolshevik put a bullet between your eyes. Even though the Bolsheviks killed the liberal White Russians first in order to polarize the Russian Revolution. Y'see, their real goal was to have absolute power after they killed the tsars and tsarists. Which you might understand if you weren't such a fuckwit.
One more thing: Don't you ever get tired of your bullshit being so easy to spot and refute?
As for my IQ, it's way above average and if I posted my average test score you wouldn't believe me anyway. You are right about one thing...the Liberals in Russia were nothing like the Liberals in the U.S. The classic meaning of a Liberal is NOTHING like the horror it stands for today. The Liberals in Russia, slayed by your heroes in the Stalin regime, were Conservatives and branded as enemies of the State and "purged" by Stalin's thugs. Classic liberalism has been hijacked by you Communists. Would you like me to refer to you as a Progressive so you can keep up?
"Look at #46. Always supporting universal healthcare and paying for it via broad-based taxation is obviously not a lie - it's implementation of policy."Thanks for admitting to that Mao;But Obama said time and again during both campaigns, " I will not raise taxes on the middle class." Just how are you going to wiggle out from this one?
"reduced deficit by half" - True, if you believe the CBO projections. Since you're a dishonest dipshit, you only believe those when they help you make your point. No, wait, the 2013 deficit has already been incurred, $680 billion, down from Duhbya's last deficit (2009) of $1.4 trillion. Are you another fuckwit who doesn't know the difference between the debt and the deficit?Total bullshit. The Federal Reserve propping up Wall Street with $960 BILLION each year. Add that to the deficit you admit to of $680 BILLION and you get 1.64 TRILLION. What part don't you get Mao?
You managed 101? Isn't that special!?Just so you've heard it before, just because liberalism starts out ending the king's tightly held, patronage monopolies doesn't mean it should schlerotically stop there. Then it would be conservative.Srsly, you idiots who only believe in centuries-old liberalism are such slow learners.
Um, those taxes aren't on the middle class, whose tax burden is lower under Obama (but you can't count and wouldn't believe the numbers if you could).
Let's see if I understand your typically foolish point. You're saying if we add an entirely different number to the deficit and call the result the deficit, then the deficit is larger.Yeah, but if you were Rush Limbaugh, you'd be a fat, ugly, drug-addled asshole.Oh, my bad, that's probably true, independently.Lessee, if you swallowed Jupiter, you'd be even fatter. And what would all the other Jupiter-eaters do for sustenance!
In case you're too stoopid to understand, I am laughing at you. You're puny. Silly boy.
I love it when you people result to personal insults. It's proof positive that your intellect has hit a brick wall and/or you cannot defend my points. Thank you for your Freudian slip of honesty.
Poor widdle baby. Call the waaaaahbulance. You're the silly Benito who's called me every communist's name since Marx. It's amazing how the most strident wingnut haters like you are such thin-skinned crybabies.
Thanks again uncle Joe.
Oh, bqwhatever, tailgunner Joe.
Post a Comment